Over a period of five weeks from November to December , 20, people rated the scrotums, using a scale from 1 to 10 stars. No other details were recorded about the entrants. To enter the contest, men had to be at least 18 years old and submit a picture of their scrotum between November 18th and December 25th, Voters did not find any of the 6 classes to be more visually appealing than another; the data showed that voters found all scrotum styles equally unappealing. Here, we examined data collected during the Autoblow 2 Balls Beauty Pageant.
Gabriella. Age: 31.
Upon submission, each participant was requested to provide their age, their general geographic location, precise up to country level; and optionally a comment about their photo.
Charlie. Age: 22.
The Balls Paper
Voters did not find any of the 6 classes to be more visually appealing than another; the data showed that voters found all scrotum styles equally unappealing. Following the methodology of our previous vulva paper , we computed ratios of genital morphology dimensions. Methods, Or How We Categorized Balls Sample Men submitted photos of their scrotums to an online balls beauty pageant organized by the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 , a robotic masturbation device for men. We learned from our previous experience in the online vulva beauty pageant that a sexually oriented pose or including features others than the object of the contest could introduce a significant bias in the ratings granted by viewers.